i just wanted to know if someone could tell me what bra i schould be wearing im 23 yrs and havent got an answer at the same time i get two different sizes when i take the sizes from under my breast i get 31” and around my breast i get 44” i get a 13 what size is that if any out there that can let me know that would be great….

My Grandmother had breast cancer at 68yrs old and declined treatment, she died of a heart attack 18 years later, the tumor never spread, had she of been opened up then I wonder what how long she would of lived!!…Oxygen to a tumor will make it spread!

In the UK the British women are told that 50yrs is the start age for a mammogram because the breast tissue does not develop compleatly until that stage in thier life.
The US has so so many breast cancer victims that it does make me question the dangers of the actual mammogram as Dr Mandelblatt stated,”some women may be getting treated for cancers that were not dangerous”!! this means that if left alone the likely hood of the cancer spreading, or your life span, would out live the cancer…..
If you read and research as I have done for many years no other country in the world has these high statistics that the US does AGAIN this worries me, and leads me to think that its not a insurance cover up BUT a realization that the radiation does indeed cause cancer, and it would be a mass public out cry to announce this as a finding, I really think there is more going on then is being admitted too.

I am not for or against the new limit I just want the truth.

Dr. Mercola says that thermography (detecting the heat signature of a mass)is better at early detection of breast cancer than dangerous x-ray mammography. In fact, repeated exposure of breast tissue to x-rays are a contributing factor to breast cancer especially in younger women with denser tissue. Plus there is no need to compress the breast to get a reading.

I can’t belive the goverment is saying this I’m 43yrs old and just finished chemo for breast cancer,i was at stage II ductal breast cancer with no history of breast cancer in my family .i’m the lucky one . i have 3 girls and i’m worried to death for them .these mammogram are so important for every woman .maybe if this was a mans issue it wouldn’t be like this .maybe we would have a cure.

RANDY FROM OHIO…. YOU ARE RIGHT ON!!!!!!!! THIS OBAMA ADMINSTATION IS INDEED CUTTING BACK, ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY AND IF THIS HEALTH CARE PACKAGE PASSES YOU GUESSED IT RIGHT!! LETS CUT BACK.. LETS TELL AMERICAN WOMEN THEY DON’T NEED EXAMS TILL THERE “50” THEN WE CUT THEM OFF AT “75”. CAN’T WAIT TO SEE WHAT ELSE THEY WANT TO CUT OUT!AND YOUR RIGHT ON ABOUT THE VACINEAN, I WOULD NEVER GET ONE!!! DID YOU HEAR THE OBAMAS GIRLS WILL NOT BE GETTING SHOTS!! WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!

I am a physician, and have to say that I was appalled at the comments of Dr. Mandelblatt, who claimed that the annual mammogram starting at age 40 might lead to some women being treated for cancers that might not be harmful. CANCER IS HARMFUL!!! This is disgusting, and I thank goodness for those outspoken female physicians like Dr. Funk, who do not buy into the bureaucracy and misinformed propaganda…I am almost 40, and I would not think twice about paying out of my own pocket for a very uncomfortable few moments of breast-crushing if it meant it might save my life. It is a tragedy that some women do not have that choice, and instead may have to wonder because of policy changes….