Debbie Rowe: 'I Want My Children'

July 2, 2009 | Michael Jackson
debbie rowe wants her kids

Michael Jackson's ex-wife, Debbie Rowe, says she wants custody of the two children she had with the pop icon.

"I want my children," Rowe told NBC4LA. Debbie, whose biological relation to Prince Michael, 12, and Paris Michael Katherine, 11, has been questioned, said she would submit to any testing to prove that the children are hers. Rowe also agreed to undergo psychological testing.

Debbie, who married Jackson in 1996, surrendered her parental rights. Later, an appeals court found that the surrendering of her rights was done in error. In 2006, Debbie and Michael entered into an out-of-court settlement regarding custody of the two children.

Earlier this week, Michael's mother Katherine was granted temporary custody of all three of the King of Pop's children -- Prince Michael, Paris, and Blanket, 7, whose mother is an unknown surrogate.

comments

Maybe she backed off because she could not afford to fight Jackson, she was nobody compared to him. Anyway, she is thier mom and whomever gets the rights to raise these young people should be given enough money each month for that job and the rest should be put away until the children reach 21 then divided between the children as MJ would have wanted. His children should be set for life and everyone else should have to support themself.

Bever
July 11, 2009

My heart goes out to Michael’s
whole family. It’s so sad.
I was big fan of Michael’s
loved all his songs. I think
Janet should get Michael’s kids.
Because, she loves them alot more than
debbie row ever could. I think Debbie
row just wants money.

Vickie
July 10, 2009

I think you people have it all wrong. First. we do not know if Debbie was a part of the kids lives. This is only a specualtion from the media and the bad mouthing of the Jackson Family. The Jackson family is only out for money. That is the truth. Jannet now has to support the family because it was comment form her father on the news. Michael has been paying for his family welfare for a long time. Janet broke away from the clan but remains close but not finacially.
Debbie has been there for her kids. Stop listening to the damn media and get with the program. How educated are you?
The reson Debgbis got testy on the news with the media, is because the papparazi grabed her and has been harrassing her form the get go to make a story and get the picture. Do you not remember what happen to Princes Diana?
The jackson fmaily put the media up to Debbie to harrasse her to make her look bad because ther Jackson family wants control of the money and the estate and those kids. Without those kids, they are pennyless.
Think about it. why did Michael break away from his family? the answer is that they are money hungry beggers.
His father is horrible and should be charge with child abuse.
Look at the history of Jo Jackson, would you want your kids with him? No way.
Those kids should go to the mother, she is not into money and Michael knew this.
Leave Michael and Debbie alone and see it for what it is….
If you can not see it, then you must not be educated enough to understand.

Dee
July 9, 2009

NO WAY JOSE!!!

She’s simply after the money - the kids are MJ’s kid, they belong in they’re family cared for by their grandma and aunts/uncle not debbie.

Did you see her swearing and being all rude on the TV? Someone like her is not fit to be a parent and would be a bad influence.

Here’s advice for Debbie —> Back OFF!

RIP MJ.

Kris
July 8, 2009

Maybe, after the memorial, you can back off a bit. I think the masses are tired of Hollywood BS and be like the rest of us

Anonymous
July 7, 2009

I definitely think the psychological testing is a huge factor in this matter. I believe that Debbie should be able to visit her children and get to know them over a period of time before any final decisions are made. The children cannot even make a decision if they don’t know her. And then there is the issue of being seperated from their little brother and that seems very unfair to him. My opionion is that the children should go to one of Michael’s brothers who would be willing to take all three and let Ms. Rowe have visitation rights after time. Then when the chidren are older and if they want to live with her, that would be their choice. We all love our grandmother’s, but it really isn’t fare to the children or the grandmother, at her age, to raise children that are so young. I don’t even think that Diana Ross should be the one, but, I think she should oversee the situations, since Michael did name her to care for the children if his Mother was unable.

Donna
July 5, 2009

Debbie Rowe should Be Ashamed of herself, using the children like stocks and bonds. A Wise and prudent judge will see right throgh her! If the kids are happy with the people they know, don’t split them up!

Anonymus
July 3, 2009

I think she should leave the kids alone they dont know her they lost there dad please dont let them lose the rest of the family toi think is mike mom cant do it maybe janet should not ms rowe

Anonymous
July 3, 2009

how could she ,you see when there is money involve,she doeson’t look like the type to be a mother .leave those kids alone ..she must of smelled money aroma ,shame on her it just turned my stomac to see what she is doing.hope the court’s can see what evil person she is love ya always micheal j

maria
July 3, 2009

OH..Did she really say I WANT MY CHILDREN? WHY??? Why the sudden desire to have the 2 kids now that Michael has passed? Didn’t she said after receiving the $8 Million settlement she stop all contact with the kids..she even said..”she loves her horses more”…Yeah right!!!I think what she really meant to say is….I WANT MY CHILDREN’S MONEY!!!- ‘Nuff Said

What???
July 3, 2009

ARE ANY OF YOU SICK OF HEARING ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON YET????? Enough already. He died a week ago. This isn’t 9/11. He was a good singer, so bury him already and let’s get on with the regular news. I can’t believe that show’s are interrupted for news on him still! GET OVER IT ALREADY!!!

Poor Farrah… her recognition pales in comparison and she was a far better person than Jackson.

Susan F.
July 2, 2009

Its not going to happen.Shes not going to get her two kids.On the Guardianship Trial.Because Michael Jacksons will saids the 3 kids are going to his mother Katherine or his Longtime friend Diana Ross.Sorry Debbie Rowe.Its not going to Happen.

Samantha
July 2, 2009

oh hells no she better not get the kids… they grew up with Michaels mom and they should stay with the Jackson’s family…..end of story

nats
July 2, 2009

debbie rowe should not get those kids.. they should stay with the jackson family

Anonymous
July 2, 2009

Why didn’t she want them before he died? All of a sudden she wants them.She should not get custody because she has never been in their lives.Michael’s mom has always been there for them.

Anonymous
July 2, 2009
post comment


(not displayed)


Back to Top »