January 20, 2009

VOTE: Michelle is Golden in Isabel Toledo!
Fashionistas, the wait is over! Incoming First Lady Michelle Obama is wearing a sparkling gold dress for her husband's inauguration.

The golden gown was designed by Cuban-American designer Isabel Toledo, and is in keeping with Mrs. Obama's habit of choosing lesser-known designers for high-profile events.
Michelle donned a black gown from the same designer for a New York City fashion world fundraiser in June 2008.
Tell "Extra" -- Was Michelle's inaugural gown a hit or a miss?



















1. The overjacket did not appear to have snaps, hook/eyes, buttons on the inner linings or other closure mechanism.
The was the formal presentation of a President and First Lady. The overjacket had ongoing billowing movement away from M’s body and at times appeared to hit the Pres. This distracted focus from the President. Does her clothing belong on his body or hers?
I feel she’s statuesque so has a strong visual imprint under any circumstance. In this event her “footprint” and by this I mean the space taken by her body and clothing versus his was larger than life and overpowering.
2. The lemongrass shift was beaded. The beading or lining was constricting from the body movement during the walk and did not have a smooth appearance from neck to hemline. Fitting for a beaded shift is more difficult because the body has daily, considered to be normal, weight, hormonal, and fluid retention fluctuations which can redistribute mass on the skeletal frame.
There was bunching and wrinkling of fabric in areas that emphasized the breasts and area from the waist to the pelvis. The hips and belly appeared larger which made M.O. appear overfed or somewhat pregnant. I won’t say a thing about the upper thighs, but….
The event was the President’s chance to shine. His appearance and composure was just right. It’s about the President, remember?
Why did Michelle want all eyes on her? Was she afraid of an assassination and thus wanted clothing as a mechanism to draw focus to her and was this to protect her family?
With a less ornate, longer bodice with closures used for the overjacket I might have supported this outfit.
I am writing this from the perspective of the home viewer. This is not meant to be overly brutal because I am sure B. and M. are being developed for higher purposes than simply the 4 years or ?? that they are President and First Lady. I am also sure the First Lady will touch and develop many lifes.
God Bless America.