Comments (5)

On 5 Jul 2008, thanksforgrilling wrote: worst cases out there, like the one who just wants to destroy everything living because he doesn’t have privy to it.

0 agree

On 4 Jul 2008, KH wrote: If Mr. Cook was so concerned about his children and what they were going to hear than he should have kept his marriage vows. He started this whole mess and now he wants it to be kept from the public maybe if he kept “Little Petey” in his pants there would be nothing to talk about.Hold your head up high Christie !!!!

2 agree

On 4 Jul 2008, ANON1 wrote: The kids are going to be hurt no matter what. Sad, but true. Unfortunately they will find out what low life scum their father is. He should have let her have custody. That way he could go on line and spend as much time and money on his ****. He could still run after girls young enough to be his daughter. He could do anything he wanted(just like he had been)and only worry about the kids finding things on his computer every other week-end. Some men are just so dumb!!! I can’t see a woman spending $3,000 dollars on ****. Most women realize that a strange **** is still attached to an ***hole.

2 agree

On 4 Jul 2008, Anonymous wrote: I can’t believe the voting results! So, even though some (too few in my opinion)believe it’s not good for the kids, most feel that this fact is overshadowed by the zeal of having THE WHOLE WORLD know what kind of sleaze the husband is. That is letting spite win over propriety - what a nice world we live in.

1 agree

On 3 Jul 2008, Billie wrote: Of course it isnt good for the kids, but Peter is a PIG and everyone should know it!!!

11 agree