Comments (7)

On 25 Feb 2008, carolyn wrote: Why is it that Britneys name has been dragged through the mud and Kevin looks like an angel??? Its his law team, that is paid for by britney every month, that trashes her name and sells fake stories to the tabloids. When she was pregnant with kevins kids, he was out partying on her tab and taking other women out to vegas and to party while she was home being a mom. This society has destroyed her,and yes, he didnt ask for more money yet, but you just wait until he has trashed her name enough and gets custody. wait till then when his story changed

0 agree

On 3 Dec 2007, Melva wrote: Britney should be paying more in child support. Most states assess 18 to 22 percent of the non-custodial parents wages for just the first child, and then more for the second. Britney’s paperwork states she makes 737,000.00 per month, and yet she is only assessed 15,000.00 for both kids. It doesn’t matter who has the kids, they should be supported and if there is a question of how the money is spent, K-Fed can be made to file expense reports. For everyone who thinks she is being cheated, do you think if she cared about them then she would not spend more than 15,000.00 per month on them if she had custody? This country automatically accuses the father of being after the money if the mother has to pay child support. When he filed for custody, Britney could have parked her behind at home, stayed sober, and took care of her kids, and she would still have them. Instead, she gets photographed reckless driving with the kids and coming out of liquor stores. Using drugs and being naked in front of the bodyguard was stupid as well. She brought this on herself. They also argue every single point in front of the judge, instead of simply complying. Britney has brought this entire situation upon herself.

1 agree

On 3 Dec 2007, Amber Nieto wrote: IT’S DOESN’T TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO SEE THAT THIS WHOLE CASE IS BUILT ON KEVIN GETTING MORE AND MORE MONEY !! HE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THE BOYS AT ALL !!!!!!!! This case should of remained in the COURTS not in the MEDIA. all of BRITNEY’S information has been leaked, but none of K-feds. Every move Brintey makes has been recorded, but not K-Feds. IT’S DOESN’T TAKE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO SEE THAT THIS WHOLE CASE IS BUILT ON KEVIN GETTING MORE AND MORE MONEY !! HE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THE BOYS AT ALL !!!!!!!!

2 agree

On 1 Dec 2007, Nonnie wrote: Kaplan is an excellent attorney and his record in handling the custody case with Federline is some outstanding family law work. Britney’s first attorney quit before Foley (her current attorney) came along. The Britney camp has over and over again not been very compliant with Judge and Commissioners Scott Gordon’s rulings. Kaplan is definitely looking out for the welfare of the toddler boys and made it clear time and again that there is no modification in the child support order. How much clearer can he make it people? It is Federline who really cares about the boys—not Britney or her camp of losers.

4 agree

On 30 Nov 2007, xxladylolitaxx wrote: The way Kaplan acts reminds me of O.J Simpson’s lawyer Johnny C. in the MEDIA. Talks about whats best for the kids, obviously how they been treating their babies MOTHER isn’t good for the kids. This case should of remained in the COURTS not in the MEDIA. all of BRITNEY’S information has been leaked, but none of K-feds. Every move Brintey makes has been recorded, but not F-keds,amd if it is. it doesn’t make it in the MEDIA. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that this whole case is built on getting MORE money. maybe not this month. but rest assure it’s coming.

8 agree

On 30 Nov 2007, xxladylolitaxx wrote: The way Kaplan acts reminds me of O.J Simpson’s lawyer Johnny C. in the MEDIA. Talks about whats best for the kids, obviously how they been treating their babies MOTHER isn’t good for the kids. This case should of remained in the COURTS not in the MEDIA. all of BRITNEY’S information has been leaked, but none of K-feds. Every move Brintey makes has been recorded, but not F-keds,amd if it is. it doesn’t make it in the MEDIA. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that this whole case is built on getting MORE money. maybe not this month. but rest assure it’s coming.

3 agree

On 30 Nov 2007, CAILLOU wrote: I THINK YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TOPIC IS ATTORNEY:KEVIN LOOKING OUT FOR KIDS,NOT MONEY ON THE NEW TV SHOW IS EXTRA FOR THIS WEEK AND NEXT WEEK IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2007.WHY DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE RIGHT TOPIC IS ATTORNEY:KEVIN LOOKING OUT FOR KIDS,NOT MONEY ON THE NEW TV SHOW IS EXTRA FOR THIS WEEK IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2007?SEE YOU ON MONDAY ON THE NEW TV SHOW IS EXTRA.HAVE A GOOD WEEKEND.AND ENJOY THE GOOD WEEKEND.

2 agree