Comments (6)

On 17 Dec 2007, dav wrote: if that was me i wwould still be in jail WRONG

1 agree

On 27 Aug 2007, Anonymous wrote: Why are the bars the under age celeb kids are going into still in business? They should lose their license. and their parents should be more responsible for their under age kids too. put them all in jail. and make them be in with the rest of the inmates. NO SPECIAL TREATMENT means you get put in with the other prisioners.

10 agree

On 27 Aug 2007, Eve wrote: They should have left her in there. 82 minutes in jail does not even count to a slap on the wrist. I hate to think how she is going to raise her own child. She’s a disgrace to society.

9 agree

On 26 Aug 2007, Toshia wrote: It goes to show that money talks.If that was anyone else that wasn’t famous they would still be behind bars. How is Nicole, Paris or Lindsay being a role model for their younger fans. I definietly don’t want my kids looking up to them.

14 agree

On 25 Aug 2007, Ray "A" wrote: It takes a good attorney to negotiate a case in chambers and with the D.A.. Well, these girls have the money to afford a “dam good” attorney. Of course, there are some good PUBLIC DEFENDERS too, that wiil get a poor person a good deal. I know. I got a “dam good” deal from a PUBLIC DEFENDER before, and I got out the same day I went to court. Another thing, the criminal justice system and the GENERAL PUBLIC do NOT want to hang substance abuse, as long as the individual is “NON-VIOLENT” and wants treatment. Plus, the institutions are full and costing TAX PAYERS too much unecessary money.

6 agree

On 24 Aug 2007, tinacrunk wrote: i think that nicloe richie go to jail that fair i am tried of pepole like can do anything and dont do time

2 agree